1. The jury assesses only the artistic side of the performed composition, the ability to render and impact on the psyche of the listener.
2. Assessment is made directly after the performance of each participant.
3. In the first and second stage rating scale 1 - 6 with an accuracy of 0.1 point.
4. Jurors receive a set of assessment cards of the participant. On each card they write down the juror's number, the performer's data, the scores and make their signature.
5. The completed cards are inserted into the envelope with the participant's number.
6. The envelope with the completed assessment cards of the participant will be put into the ballot box.
7. After hearing of all performers of the group, the ballot box will be opened and scores from assessment cards of the participant will be read.
8. The opening of the ballot box and reading of the scoring takes place in the presence of the public.
9. Each assessment is entered into the computer and displayed for the participants' information.
10. All ratings of each participant are added together and the average rating is calculated.
11. The highest and the lowest assessments will not be taken into account. The number of rejected atings is determined by the jury.
12. After entering the ratings of all participants of a given category, the computer calculates the average assessment of each participant and displays them anonymously in order from highest to lowest (without names and codes of participants).
13. The jury on the basis of the average ratings (without names and codes of participants) determines how many people will be qualified to a higher stage
14. After the decision of the Jury computer displays the names of the participants qualified for a higher stage in the sequence of code without ratings of participants to avoid any suggestion.
15. For qualifying to the second stage the participant receives 1 point for each position on the list counting from the bottom (e.g.: participant on the first position receives 10 points, on the second 9 etc. and if e.g. 12 persons is qualified - the first participant receives 12 points, the econd 11.....).
16. In the case of a division of category on groups in the first stage, when the hearings are held in various committees - the participants of the first position of each group will receive 10 points of the second 9 etc., regardless of how many participants were qualified.
17. For the qualifying for the third stage the participant receives 4 points for each position on the list from the bottom (eg, I-20p, 16p-II, III-12p, 8p IV-V-4p).
18. In the event of a tie after the first and second stage, participants receive the same amount of points.
19. In the third stage, after hearing of the entire category each juror independently without consultation selects 3 best participants and assigns them a 3, 2 or 1 point. Only one participant from each Juror may receive 3 points, 2 points one and one 1 point - others do not receive points.
20. Each juror independently assigns points according to their own feelings without any consultation.
21. Points are entered in the appropriate score card, inserted into an envelope and thrown into the ballot box.
22. After completion of the final concert (stage III) the ballot box is opened and scoring of each juror is read.
23. The opening of the ballot box and reading of the scoring takes place in the presence of the public.
24. Scoring is entered into the computer and displayed to the public.
25. All points received from the Jurors are added together.
26. To the points received from jurors, points from stages I and II are added
27. The participant's position is determined by the number of gained points.
28. Über Qualifizierung für einen bestimmten Platz enscheidet selbst die kleinste Differenz in der Bewertung.
29. In the event of a tie after the third stage the participant's position is determined by the position of the participant in the second stage, if in the second stage occurred tie the position is determined by position in the first stage.
30. The jury's decisions are final.

Andrzej Wawrzyniuk